Luhmann and Globalization

نویسنده

  • Ole Thyssen
چکیده

In Luhmann's scheme of social systems, "society" in not, as in colloquial talk, the nation. As Luhmann defines social systems in only one dimension, communication, and as communications can easily connect to other communications across geographical borderlines, it is no wonder that the spatially defined nation is not occupying an important position in his theory. "Society" is the world society, the system of all communication. This inclusive system with no social counter-concept is differentiated in functional subsystems such as economy, politics and science which also are global in scope. Globalization is, by the choice of basic concepts, built into Luhmann's theory of social systems. The concept of a nation, however, is ambiguous. It can, in a neutral sense, refer to a population inhabiting a delimited territory and subjected to a central power. And it can, in a normative sense, refer to a special kind of political self-description, nationalism, developing and flourishing in the period between 1789 and 1914. According to Luhmann, nationalism is a phase in the evolution of political self-descriptions. He considers the nationalistic semantics as outdated and unable to describe modern society. It can be discussed whether Luhmann is correct in arguing that the nationalist semantics has lost its power. After 1989, it seems to be strengthening. Still, Luhmann's predilection for temporal as opposed to spatial descriptions makes him describe nations as mere geographical subdivisions of the world society. They may exploit irregularities in the functional subsystems but are theoretically unimportant. Claiming the obsolescence of the nationalist semantics does not, however, imply a denial of the significance of the nation or its political representative, the state. Luhmann accepts that nations fulfill important political functions. So a tension can be seen in Luhmann's theory of social systems. On one side, the world is globalized due to the dynamics of functional subsystems. On the other hand, nations are still the most important political actors. When Luhmann defines the state as "the self-description of the political system", he implicitly takes the point of view of the nation and, as a consequence, accepts a plurality of political systems. Following his theory design there should be only one global political system. Even if that may be analytically true, as all political actors connect to all political actors on the global scene, still there is no effective world state and no global political self-description. Such irregularities call for a renewed systems theoretical analysis of the relation between nation, state and world society, showing that the dilemma between the global and the national perspective is not a real one. Functional subsystems, organizations and states are structurally coupled and together account for the dynamics of the world society. In the end of the paper it is argued that the problems of globalization may be analyzed as consequences of this coupling of three different kinds of social system having different goals, number of stakeholders, relations to time and space and responsibility for stakeholders, namely functional subsystems, private organizations and states. As no political agent is representing the tangled and hyper-complex political system as a whole, it is not possible to harmonize the problems arising from the anarchic interplay of the three systems. Creating second-order super nations such as EU would not solve the problems, but only rearrange them. This rather pessimistic perspective on the possibility of handling the problems of globalization is inherent in Luhmann's acrid statement in Social systems: survival depends on evolution, that is, chance. 1 Ole Thyssen, professor, dr. phil., Department for Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School, e-mail [email protected]. I want to thank Dirk Baecker and Gorm Harste who read an earlier draft of this paper and by their both critical and constructive comments forced me to rethink, revise and rewrite.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What is Global and What is Local? A Theoretical Discussion Around Globalization

This article develops a new sociological understanding of the difference between global and local relating to the phenomena of globalization. Globalization itself is redefined as one of society’s self-description insofar as, following Niklas Luhmann’s theory, society is conceived as a cognitive system that can only handle information (about the world, about itself) only through its own specific...

متن کامل

Interaction versus action, and Luhmanns sociology of communication

Both “actions” and “interactions” are micro-operations that can be aggregated from a system’s perspective. Whereas “actions” operate historically, “interactions” provide the events with “meaning” from a hindsight perspective. Luhmann’s sociology of communication systems adds to the approach of symbolic interactionism the question what global dimensions of communication mean for local interactio...

متن کامل

Luhmann On-line Teaching and Applying Theory Editorial the Utility of Luhmann

"I met profesor Luhmann in Guadalajara, Mexico, 1992; he was there to talk about his theory. He was so kind to all of us. I can't forget his smile and his powerful arguments about the theory of systems and Autopoisis. By that time I was a student in the University of Guadalajara. After the seminar of a WHOLE WEEK, he spent some time talking only with 6 of us during two hrs. He talked about his ...

متن کامل

Space Is the Place: the Laws of Form and Social Systems

It is well known that Niklas Luhmann‟s theory of social systems is grounded in Spencer-Brown‟s seminal Laws of Form (LoF ) or „calculus of indications‟. It is also known that the reception of the latter has been rather problematic. This article attempts to describe the construction of LoF, and confront it with Niklas Luhmann‟s ontological and epistemological premises. I show how LoF must be con...

متن کامل

The Nature - Society - System and the Global Sustainable Information Society ( GSIS )

The approach suggested in this paper argues that sustainability is a multimodal issue having an ecological, a technological, an economic, a political, and a cultural dimension. Existing sustainability indicators lack aspects of information and ICT, existing information society indicators lack aspects of sustainability. What is needed are indicators that measure the degree to which a sustainable...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007